Lack of Documentation on Isolation/Purification of SARS-COV-2: Absent in Every Location, Throughout History - Suggesting Its Nonexistence
In a recent article published on the website fluoridefreepeel.ca, author Dylan Eleven asserts that Freedom of Information (FOI) requests worldwide have not provided evidence supporting the claim that there is no record anywhere in the world of SARS-CoV-2 virus isolation or purification. However, a closer look at the facts reveals a different story.
The article in question highlights that as of its publication, there are 225 FOIs regarding the absence of records documenting the isolation or purification of SARS-CoV-2. This number is a significant increase from the initial 90 FOIs mentioned in the same article's earlier version.
However, it's crucial to note that these FOIs do not support the assertion that there is no record of SARS-CoV-2 isolation or purification. Investigations and FOI document releases related to COVID-19 origins, including records obtained from U.S. institutions and biolabs, do not indicate an absence of SARS-CoV-2 isolation. Instead, they include correspondence, research, and institutional data about virus samples and related research practices.
Leading research groups, such as those supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), actively isolate, characterize, and study SARS-CoV-2 and related coronaviruses, which inherently requires virus isolation and purification methods. These scientific efforts are well-documented in peer-reviewed publications, research emails, and institutional records, including those accessed via FOI requests, and contradict claims that such isolation records do not exist.
Moreover, publicly accessible FOI disclosure logs from government bodies, such as the Jersey Government, archive numerous responses to FOI requests but do not reveal credible findings of a global absence of SARS-CoV-2 isolation documentation. Such claims often stem from misunderstanding the technical definitions of "isolation" in virology or misinterpretation of FOI request responses.
It's important to clarify that the FOIs made by Dylan Eleven were not limited to SARS-CoV-2 but also extended to various institutions around the world and included requests regarding secretive and unscientific "mock infected" cells and fabricated "virus genomes." However, these requests have not yielded evidence supporting the claim that no virus (including HIV, avian influenza, HPV, Influenza, Measles, etc.) has ever been isolated and purified.
The author's comments on articles are intended to provide truthful information, additional details, clarification, validation, or rebuttals. However, it's essential to ensure that these comments are based on accurate and verifiable information. In this case, the assertion that there is no record of SARS-CoV-2 virus isolation or purification is not supported by the authoritative FOI disclosures or scientific consensus.
The list of institutions to which FOI requests were made can be found at this link: fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/. Additionally, the institution list is also available as an Excel file at this link: fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Institution-list-for-website.xlsx.
In conclusion, while FOI requests have been made and analysed extensively, none provide valid evidence supporting the claim that there is no record anywhere in the world of SARS-CoV-2 virus isolation or purification—contrary to the assertion on fluoridefreepeel.ca. It's crucial to approach such assertions with a critical eye and to verify information from credible sources.
- The article published on fluoridefreepeel.ca noted a significant increase from 90 to 225 Freedom of Information (FOI) requests worldwide that have been made regarding the absence of records documenting SARS-CoV-2 virus isolation or purification.
- Leading research groups and institutions, such as those supported by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), actively conduct scientific research on SARS-CoV-2 and related coronaviruses, a process that inherently requires virus isolation and purification methods.
- Publicly accessible FOI disclosure logs from government bodies, like the Jersey Government, archive numerous responses to FOI requests; however, they do not reveal any credible findings of a global absence of SARS-CoV-2 isolation documentation.
- It's important to approach assertions made by Dylan Eleven with a critical eye and to verify information from credible sources, as the assertion that there is no record of SARS-CoV-2 virus isolation or purification is not supported by authoritative FOI disclosures or scientific consensus.
