Skip to content
Fires — Mental-health — womens-health — Car-accidents — Just — Mens-health — Skin-care — accidents — Weight-management — Workplace-wellness — Migration — Parenting — Cance — Skin-conditions — health-and-wellness — Voluntary — Medical-conditions — Eye-health — Science — Estimate — Nutrition — Medicare — Palliative — Autoimmune-disorders — crime-and-justice — Politics — general-news — Digestive-health — Aging — Cbd — Chronic-diseases — Pence — Hearing — War-and-conflicts — Fitness-and-exercise — Sexual-health — Sleep

MP justifies financial and emotional burdens associated with the proposed assisted-dying legislation following release of its impact evaluation.

The legislator sponsoring the assisted dying bill robustly defended the legislation on Saturday, following the release of its impact assessment.

,   and  Administrator
4 min read

MP justifies financial and emotional burdens associated with the proposed assisted-dying legislation following release of its impact evaluation.

The Battle Over Assisted Dying: Exploring the Human Impact and Cost Implications

Assisted Dying is never just about the money; it's about the agonizing decisions faced by the terminally ill and their families, as Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP behind the proposed legislation, emphasizes. After the release of an impact assessment for the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill, she underscores the bill's humanitarian focus in a conversation with BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

Published on Friday, the impact assessment outlines possible costs associated with the service, reduced end-of-life care costs, and the number of potential applicants. With the next Commons debate on the proposed law scheduled for May 16, the discussion continues to weigh heavily on MPs, healthcare professionals, and human rights advocates.

"Discussing assisted dying is a delicate balancing act," Leadbeater admits. "It's primarily about the human cost – the experience of a terminal illness that leaves no hope for recovery. The bill provides a robust solution in this area, but it doesn't come without a cost."

Supporting the financial estimates, Katherine Sleeman, a palliative care professor at King's College, explains, "It's inevitable that legalizing assisted dying will yield cost savings because the costs associated with end-of-life care are substantial, especially for those living their final months. However, these figures are mere estimates and should be treated with caution."

Naturally, concerns about the potential consequences of such legislation have arisen. Dr. Gordon Macdonald, chief executive of Care Not Killing, argues that "changing the law will save money and could subtly encourage some vulnerable terminally ill people to end their lives."

Bolstering concerns, Bishop of London Dame Sarah Mullally calls the cost savings "chilling" and expresses her opposition to any legislation that puts pressure on the vulnerable and prioritizes savings over human lives.

"It's important to remember that each life is worth far more than the money saved through their premature death," she insists.

After undergoing significant changes and the dismissal of the High Court safeguard, the bill now relies on expert panels for approval. Should the bill pass into law, it would offer terminally ill adults with fewer than six months to live the option of a medically assisted death, subject to multiple checks and safeguards.

By Helen Corbett and Aine Fox, PA

*Enrichment Data:

Estimated Numbers and Costs

The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill is expected to impact a substantial number of individuals through assisted deceases.[1][5] Estimates indicate that the total number of applicants could range from 273 to 1,311 in the first year (2029-2030)[5]. Over time, this number is predicted to rise significantly, reaching anywhere from 1,042 and 4,559 assisted deaths by year ten.[1] The bill also considers reductions in end-of-life care costs, potentially saving up to £60 million after ten years.[1]

Concerns and Safety Measures

Despite the safeguards in place within the bill, including voluntary decision-making, capacity assessments, and a multi-disciplinary review process,[1][2] concerns persist regarding potential pressure on vulnerable individuals and undue influence.

Implementation Timeline and Delays

The bill's implementation is currently delayed, with rollout potentially extended until 2029.[1] The complexity and sensitivity surrounding the legislation necessitate careful consideration and adjustments before the service becomes operational.

  1. The bill, Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life), focuses on the human cost associated with terminal illness rather than the financial implications.
  2. The bill provides a solution to the agonizing decisions faced by the terminally ill and their families.
  3. The impact assessment outlines the potential costs related to the service, reduced end-of-life care costs, and the estimated number of applicants.
  4. The bill's debate is scheduled for May 16, causing continued discussion among MPs, healthcare professionals, and human rights advocates.
  5. Leadbeater acknowledges that discussing assisted dying is a delicate balancing act between the human cost and the potential costs.
  6. Sleeman underscores that the cost savings associated with legalizing assisted dying are estimates that should be treated with caution.
  7. Macdonald fears that changing the law may inadvertently encourage vulnerable terminally ill people to end their lives.
  8. Mullally condemns the focus on cost savings over human lives, finding the potential savings "chilling."
  9. The bill relies on expert panels for approval.
  10. If passed, the bill would offer terminally ill adults the option of a medically assisted death, subject to multiple checks and safeguards.
  11. Estimates indicate that the total number of applicants in the first year (2029-2030) could range from 273 to 1,311.
  12. Over time, the number is predicted to rise significantly, potentially reaching 1,042 to 4,559 assisted deaths by year ten.
  13. The bill considers reductions in end-of-life care costs, potentially saving up to £60 million after ten years.
  14. Despite the safeguards, concerns persist regarding potential pressure on vulnerable individuals and undue influence.
  15. The bill's implementation is delayed, with rollout potentially extended until 2029.
  16. The complexity and sensitivity surrounding the legislation necessitate careful consideration and adjustments before the service becomes operational.
  17. The advancement of science and medical technologies impacts the debate on assisted dying, as people live longer with chronic diseases like cancer, respiratory conditions, and digestive health issues.
  18. Eye health, hearing, and skin conditions are also relevant considerations in the debate on end-of-life care and assisted dying.
  19. Fitness and exercise, nutrition, and mental health are crucial components of workplace wellness and medical conditions management.
  20. Autoimmune disorders, men's health, and women's health are important aspects of individual and public health, with various therapies and treatments available.
  21. Migrants, refugees, and those affected by war and conflicts face unique health challenges, as do those involved in accidents, fires, or criminal justice matters, affecting general news, politics, and policy discussions.
Controversial lawmaker advocated robustly for the assisted dying bill's legitimacy on Saturday in response to a critique of its effects, as per an impact assessment.

Read also:

    Related

    Latest