Vaccine Shots Accused of Being Deliberate Killings (Covid-19)
In a recent article published on his Substack page, American Attorney Thomas Renz has sparked controversy by asserting that Covid-19 injections are, in fact, pre-meditated murder. Renz's claims are based on what he describes as 'smoking gun evidence' suggesting a darker intention behind the rollout of these vaccines.
Renz argues that these injections are not traditional vaccines but gene therapy products, designed as potentially lethal weapons. He contends that they carry the risk of adverse effects, including malignant transformation (conversion of cells into cancer cells), even years after the injection.
One of the key pieces of evidence Renz presents is a 2023 study that confirmed a link between Covid injections and cancer in individuals with 'long Covid'. This study, coupled with a 2015 report on the transmissibility of viral vectors in gene therapies, raises concerns about the safety of these injections.
The 2015 report, published in the journal Nature Cancer Gene Therapy, showed that shedding of viral vectors occurs in practice, raising safety concerns. Vaccine shedding, where a vaccinated person releases components of a vaccine, can potentially affect those who did not consent to being vaccinated.
Renz's claims are further supported by the admission in Moderna and Pfizer's own SEC filings that their Covid injections are gene therapy products. He also provides evidence from a 2015 'Guidance to Industry' document that US authorities were aware of the potential for Covid-19 vaccine recipients to shed harmful substances to those who did not consent to gene therapy.
While vaccine shedding is known to occur, the official narrative denies that it is happening with Covid 'vaccines'. Renz's article suggests that this evidence indicates a conspiracy to coerce, bribe, and lie to get these injections into as many arms as possible.
It is important to note that these claims are highly contentious and not universally accepted. As with any scientific debate, it is crucial to consider multiple perspectives and continue to question and investigate the evidence presented.
For those interested in delving deeper into this topic, Renz's latest article can be found here. The article provides a comprehensive overview of the evidence supporting Renz's claims, and it serves as a starting point for further research and discussion.
){kind=link}